A SHORT COMPARATIVE REVIEW ON THE ANALYSIS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN THE FEMORAL HEAD AND SKULL MORPHOLOGY FOR SEX DETERMINATION
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: This study presents a comparative review of existing research focusing on the correlation between the morphologies of these two skeletal elements, highlighting their effectiveness in sex determination across diverse populations.
Methodology: An extensive literature review was conducted, analyzing peer-reviewed studies that examine the sexual dimorphism of the femoral head and skull. Quantitative measurements and morphological descriptions were extracted and compared.
Results: The findings indicate a significant correlation between femoral head dimensions and specific cranial features in reliably discerning biological sex. Femoral head size, in particular, demonstrated a strong positive correlation with male skull characteristics, such as increased brow ridge prominence and greater overall skull robustness. However, the degree of correlation varied among different populations, suggesting that regional morphological variations could influence the outcomes of sex determination methodologies.
Conclusion: This comparative review underscores the importance of integrating both femoral head and skull analysis for enhanced accuracy in sex determination in forensic contexts. While both skeletal elements possess inherent dimorphic traits, their combined analysis may yield more reliable outcomes, particularly in populations with unique morphological characteristics. Future research should focus on developing standardized methodologies that consider diverse population metrics to improve the precision of sex estimation from skeletal remains.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Adams, D. M., Blatt, S. H., Flaherty, T. M., Haug, J. D., Isa, M. I., Michael, A. R., & Smith, A. C. (2023). Shifting the forensic anthropological paradigm to incorporate the transgender and gender diverse community. Humans, 3(3), 142–165.
Audenaert, E. A., Pattyn, C., Steenackers, G., De Roeck, J., Vandermeulen, D., & Claes, P. (2019). Statistical shape modeling of skeletal anatomy for sex discrimination: their training size, sexual dimorphism, and asymmetry. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 7, 302.
Bethard, J. D., & VanSickle, C. (2020). Applications of sex estimation in paleoanthropology, bioarchaeology, and forensic anthropology. In Sex Estimation of the Human Skeleton (pp. 25–34). Academic Press.
Byers, S. N., & Juarez, C. A. (2018). Introduction to Forensic Anthropology. Routledge.
Çiftçi, R., Dönmez, E., Kurtoğlu, A., Eken, Ö., Samee, N. A., & Alkanhel, R. I. (2024). Human gender estimation from CT images of skull using deep feature selection and feature fusion. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 16879.
Crawford, K., & Paglen, T. (2021). Excavating AI: The politics of images in machine learning training sets. AI & Society, 36(4), 1105–1116.
Enaohwo, T. M., Udi, O. A., Ebite, L. E., & Ebeye, O. A. (2011). Sex determination from femoral head in Ethiope-East Local Government Area, Delta State, Nigeria. African Journal of Tropical Medicine and Biomedical Research, 2(1), 84–90.
Fonseca, M. T., Siqueira, L. F., Belo, I. S., Rodrigues, L. G., de Torres, É. M., Franco, A., & Silva, R. F. (2023). Anatomy of the mastoid triangle and morphometric sex differences. Morphologie, 107(357), 252–258.
Garvin, H. M. (2020). Adult sex estimation from cranial morphological traits. In Sex Estimation of the Human Skeleton (pp. 95–112). Academic Press.
Garofalo, E. M., & Garvin, H. M. (2020). The confusion between biological sex and gender and potential implications of misinterpretations. In Sex Estimation of the Human Skeleton (pp. 35–52). Academic Press.
Heng, D., Manica, S., & Franco, A. (2022). Forensic dentistry as an analysis tool for sex estimation: A review of current techniques. Research and Reports in Forensic Medical Science, 12, 25–39.
Mori, E., Mazza, G., & Lovari, S. (2022). Sexual dimorphism. In Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior (pp. 6389–6395). Springer International Publishing.
Negi, B. K., & Gurung, D. (2024). Sexual dimorphism and sex estimation: Review in forensic odontology. Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research KLEU, 17(3), 192–199.
Sarkodie-Gyan, T., & Yu, H. (2023). The human locomotor system: Physiological and technological foundations. In The Human Locomotor System: Physiological and Technological Foundations (pp. 1–76). Springer International Publishing.
Sládek, V., Macháček, J., Makajevová, E., Přichystalová, R., & Hora, M. (2018). Body mass estimation in skeletal samples using the hybrid approach: the effect of population-specific variations and sexual dimorphism. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 10, 833–847.
Spitz, W. U., & Diaz, F. J. (2020). Spitz and Fisher’s Medicolegal Investigation of Death: Guidelines for the Application of Pathology to Crime Investigation. Charles C Thomas Publisher.
Sorrentino, R., Belcastro, M. G., Figus, C., Stephens, N. B., Turley, K., Harcourt-Smith, W., Ryan, T. M., & Benazzi, S. (2020). Exploring sexual dimorphism of the modern human talus through geometric morphometric methods. PLOS ONE, 15(2), e0229255.
Toneva, D. H., Nikolova, S. Y., Tasheva-Terzieva, E. D., Zlatareva, D. K., & Lazarov, N. E. (2022). Sexual dimorphism in shape and size of the neurocranium. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 136(6), 1851–1863.
Ubelaker, D. H., & DeGaglia, C. M. (2017). Population variation in skeletal sexual dimorphism. Forensic Science International, 278, 407.e1–407.e7.
Wang, X., Liu, G., Wu, Q., Zheng, Y., Song, F., & Li, Y. (2024). Sex estimation techniques based on skulls in forensic anthropology: A scoping review. PLOS ONE, 19(12), e0311762.